Visa’s stablecoin settlement business has reached an annualized volume of approximately $7 billion, while Mastercard has established partnerships with 85 crypto companies, including Binance, Ripple, and PayPal. The two major card networks are integrating stablecoins into their underlying clearing and settlement infrastructure. This is not merely news for the crypto industry; it may also gradually transform the factors that virtual card users care about most—top-up fees, transaction processing speeds, and BIN stability.
Card organizations no longer view stablecoins as a niche business
In March 2026, Visa and Bridge—a stablecoin infrastructure company owned by Stripe—announced that they would expand their stablecoin-linked card service to more than 100 countries. Subsequently, Visa added multiple blockchains to its settlement network. Mastercard, meanwhile, launched the Crypto Partner Program to collaborate with wallets, exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and payment processors, and to further explore payments initiated and completed by AI agents.
If you use FotonCard, PokePay, or other virtual cards that are reloaded with USDT or USDC, the underlying funding process is changing. In the past, stablecoins typically had to be converted into fiat currency first, then settled through the issuing bank and card network; the new model allows some issuers to use stablecoins directly to complete settlement with the card network.
How Do Traditional Stablecoin Virtual Cards Process Payments?
The traditional process typically works as follows: Users deposit USDT into the platform’s wallet; the platform converts it into U.S. dollars through an exchange or liquidity provider; a BIN sponsor or partner bank then routes the U.S. dollars to the Visa or Mastercard networks; and finally, the card networks settle the transaction with the merchant.
This process involves multiple steps, including on-chain confirmation, exchange, bank crediting, and card network settlement. Each additional step can result in spreads, fees, and delays. This is one of the reasons why many crypto virtual card top-ups take several tens of minutes, why overall costs are difficult to reduce, and why cards sometimes become suddenly unavailable.
What Has Visa's Stablecoin Settlement Model Changed?
Visa’s approach is to allow eligible issuers to settle transactions directly using stablecoins. According to publicly available information, Visa has expanded its stablecoin settlement support to include networks such as Solana, Avalanche, and Arbitrum, eliminating the need for partners to convert stablecoins into traditional fiat currency before each settlement.
In its earnings call, Visa disclosed that its stablecoin settlement pilot has reached an annualized volume of approximately $7 billion, but the company also emphasized that the business is still in its early stages. This means that stablecoin settlement has moved from proof of concept to actual operation, though there is still some way to go before all virtual card platforms and ordinary users can widely benefit from it.
Bridge’s role is more focused on connecting stablecoins with existing bank card networks. Following Stripe’s acquisition of Bridge, it will be able to integrate stablecoin wallets, card issuance, and the Visa merchant network. For example, eligible users can top up their virtual card accounts with USDC and then make purchases at Visa-accepting merchants, while the platform’s backend handles currency conversion, compliance, and settlement.
Mastercard has taken a different approach
Visa places greater emphasis on settlement infrastructure, while Mastercard is expanding its partnership ecosystem. Its Crypto Partner Program encompasses approximately 85 companies, including wallets and trading platforms such as Binance and Bybit, stablecoin-related firms such as Circle, and payment service providers such as Ripple and PayPal.
Mastercard has also opened up its card network capabilities to AI agent payment scenarios. In the future, automated agents may independently purchase cloud resources, software services, data, or digital goods, subject to user authorization and spending limits. For virtual card platforms, this will increase the importance of one-time cards, merchant restrictions, dynamic spending limits, and auditable transaction records.
Actual Impact on Virtual Card Users
Recharge costs may decrease
Currently, the total cost of reloading crypto virtual cards typically ranges from 1% to 3%, which includes the spread between stablecoins and fiat currency, processing fees, and platform profits. If the issuing platform can settle transactions directly using stablecoins, some of these conversion costs could be reduced. However, whether platforms pass these cost savings on to users depends on specific pricing strategies and market competition.
Top-up speeds may increase
The old process required waiting for on-chain confirmation, exchange processing, and bank crediting, which could take as little as 20 minutes or as long as over two hours. With stablecoin direct settlement eliminating these intermediate steps, confirmation times have the potential to approach the processing speed of the underlying blockchain. However, KYC, risk control reviews, blockchain congestion, and internal platform queues will still affect the actual time it takes for funds to be credited.
BIN Stability Is Expected to Improve
Virtual card users often encounter situations where their BIN is restricted by merchants, issuing partnerships are terminated, or cards suddenly become invalid. Once card organizations formally support stablecoin settlements at the contractual and compliance levels, partner banks and card issuers will have a clearer path for processing crypto funds, which may alleviate some compliance pressures and potentially extend the lifecycle of BINs.
However, settlement via stablecoins does not guarantee that a merchant will accept a specific BIN. Advertising platforms, cloud service providers, and subscription-based merchants will still make independent determinations based on the cardholder’s country, account region, billing address, chargeback rate, and transaction risk.
Data Worth Monitoring Over Time
By mid-2026, industry reports indicate that the volume of stablecoin transactions, crypto card payments, and card network settlement volumes all continued to grow. Visa settled approximately $7 billion in stablecoin transactions on an annualized basis, indicating that card networks have begun processing actual transaction volumes rather than merely conducting pilot programs for demonstration purposes.
For ordinary users, three metrics are more important than the total transaction volume for the entire industry: the actual top-up fee rate of the target platform, the time it takes for funds transferred from the blockchain to become available in the card balance, and the success rate of consecutive payments using the same BIN at the target merchant. Only these metrics can determine whether infrastructure upgrades have truly benefited end users.
How should I choose a virtual card now?
- View Settlement Instructions:Check whether the platform clearly discloses its Visa Direct, stablecoin settlement, or card-issuing partners, rather than simply stating that it “supports USDT.”
- Microtesting:First, verify the top-up time, the actual amount credited, the payment success rate, and the refund process, and then gradually increase the usage limit.
- Calculate the comprehensive rate:In addition to deposit fees, you should also consider account activation fees, transaction fees, exchange rate spreads, fees for failed transactions, and withdrawal costs.
- Prepare a contingency plan:Even when connecting to a new settlement network, the BIN and merchant risk controls may still change; therefore, key subscription or advertising accounts should have backup payment methods ready.
- Emphasizing Compliance:Choose platforms that have reasonable KYC requirements, transparent terms and conditions, and customer service channels, and avoid using cards from unknown sources or accounts verified by third parties.
Don’t immediately transfer all your funds just because a platform advertises that it “now supports Visa stablecoin settlements.” You should base your decision on your own experience with deposit processing times, actual fees, payment success rates, and refund processes—there’s often a time lag between marketing claims and the actual user experience.
summarize
Visa and Mastercard’s integration of stablecoins does not mean that traditional bank cards will be replaced; rather, stablecoins are becoming a new layer of funding and settlement within card networks. For virtual card users, the most promising developments are lower top-up costs, faster transaction processing, and more stable partnerships with card issuers.
These changes typically take several months to filter down from the card networks to individual platforms. At this stage, there’s no need to frequently switch virtual cards in response to industry news; simply keep a close eye on fees, settlement times, BIN success rates, and refund capabilities. The platforms truly worth choosing are not those that best promote “stablecoin settlement,” but rather those that can translate underlying efficiency into more transparent fees and a more stable user experience.
English 
Chinese